Former Stanford pupil King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez in a automobile crash again in 2021. That’s an undisputed reality. When the Juarez household informed the college about the entire “killing two folks” factor, nevertheless, Vanga sued for defamation, claiming they couldn’t name him a assassin as a result of he had solely been charged with vehicular manslaughter. Because the Stanford Every day stories, although, in an precise victory without cost speech protections, Vanga misplaced his lawsuit towards Priscilla Juarez late final month.
King Vanga, who killed Pamela and Joe Juarez together with his automobile, initially claimed a letter the Juarez household despatched Stanford was defamatory as a result of in it, they known as him a assassin, claimed he was below the affect on the time of the crash and asserted that he’d violated the Stanford Code of Conduct. Vanga denied all of these claims. The court docket disagreed, saying the homicide and code of conduct claims had been opinions and regarded protected speech below the First Modification. The court docket additionally dominated that Juarez had motive to imagine Vanga was below the affect on the time of the crash because it had been reported within the native information regardless of Vanga’s declare on the contrary:
On June 25, 2021, Vanga was concerned in a automobile accident in Atwater, California, which resulted within the deaths of Jose and Pamela Juarez. Vanga was charged with two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter whereas intoxicated, resisting an government officer, trying to take a peace officer’s firearm and battery upon a peace officer. Vanga pleaded not responsible to those costs.
Vanga allegedly declined a breathalyzer take a look at on the scene, in accordance with the regulation enforcement officer who responded to the accident. Nonetheless, the officer claimed that Vanga was below the affect. In line with the police report, the officer “detected a powerful odor of alcoholic beverage emitting from [Vanga’s] breath and individual and noticed his eyes had been purple.”
The media tales that circulated within the subsequent days additionally acknowledged Vanga had been below the affect of both medicine, alcohol or each, as per regulation enforcement stories quoted throughout the case.
This prompted Priscilla Juarez and a number of different relations to put in writing emails and letters to Stanford. In her e mail, she wrote she hoped the College would “take correct motion in dismissing this man as an energetic pupil of [the] morally prestigious establishment.”
…
In December 2021, Vanga threatened to sue Atwater police and California Freeway Patrol for alleged mistreatment and false accusation of a DUI. Vanga alleged he was punched, kicked and tased twice by responding officers. In the meantime, blood samples from the evening of the accident confirmed no presence of medicine or alcohol.
Lawyer Ken “Popehat” White represented Juarez within the swimsuit, submitting an anti-SLAPP movement to have it dismissed on the grounds that the swimsuit violated his consumer’s First Modification rights. SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit In opposition to Public Participation and customarily refers to lawsuits filed on questionable grounds with the intent to stifle free speech. Anti-SLAPP statutes enable defendants to have these lawsuits dismissed if the movement is granted and in addition get better any lawyer’s charges.
“There’s a development the place wealthy folks assume that the poor ought to solely have as a lot free speech as they’ll afford. And that to me, [that’s] what this case was about, and that’s why I’m glad we’ve a software just like the anti-SLAPP statute,” White informed the Every day.
Sadly for the Juarezes, Vanga additionally filed defamation fits towards different relations and people nonetheless haven’t been in entrance of a choose. However whereas nothing is assured, it appears like White believes there’s an excellent probability they’ll see related outcomes, telling the Every day, “Each case is slightly totally different as a result of each case is predicated on what that defendant mentioned of their letter [to Stanford]. However in my opinion, [Priscilla Juarez’s family members] ought to be very optimistic based mostly on this outcome.”
As we talked about when we first reported on this lawsuit, nobody pressured Vanga to sue the Juarez household. He may have merely let this entire factor go and targeted on getting ready for his possible conviction. The results of killing two folks aren’t often satisfying, however odds are, he in all probability would have remained largely unknown outdoors of the Bay Space. As a substitute, he had the audacity to sue the household of the folks he killed together with his automobile, and in doing so, drew the eye of nationwide media. Consequently, much more folks know King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez together with his automobile in 2021.
It isn’t clear when King Vanga’s legal trial will start, however hopefully, it doesn’t take an excessive amount of longer. He deserves to face the results for what he did, whether or not he was below the affect on the time of the crash or not.
