McLaren received the Constructors’ Championship, and Ferrari, in contrast, misplaced it. This occurred through the 2024 Method 1 racing season. The reason being fairly clear sadly, contemplating the Maranello crew’s errors. We have now reiterated this exhaustively, we should admit, in a number of articles devoted to the Italian crew for a lot of months now. The problem stays the identical and revolves across the lack of ability of the technical crew led by Italian aerodynamicist Enrico Cardile, the previous technical director of the Maranello squad, to provide efficient aerodynamic bundle. And by now it’s a well-know incontrovertible fact that the Spanish Grand Prix was sadly the start of the catastrophe that crippled the Prancing Horse.
The Italian aspect launched a brand new model of the medium-to-high downforce rear wing. However crucial innovation was undoubtedly the ground, a vital macro-component for producing aerodynamic load. When such a component is launched on a automotive competing in crucial class of motorsport, it requires efficient on-track validation. Certainly, it’s not in any respect easy to right away decide whether or not the research performed on the manufacturing unit, between simulator and wind tunnel, have actually resulted in a tangible enchancment. Because of this, on the Circuit de Catalunya in Barcelona, the decision remained undecided.
Nevertheless, between the Austrian Grand Prix and the race weekend in Nice Britain, the solutions got here loud and clear. The brand new flooring of the SF-24 didn’t work as meant. It generated appreciable instability by way of dealing with, eliminating the function of the Ferrari that drivers appreciated most: its predictability. There was important bouncing and, usually talking, nice problem in using the right trip heights. On the Hungarian Grand Prix, a “fast repair” was launched by the Maranello crew’s technicians and engineers, which was in reality a preliminary modification to make this element extra manageable whereas ready for a wholly new flooring, which might solely arrive in Italy for the house race on the Monza circuit.
Within the meantime, six races the place the SF-24 showcased all its limitations. Aggressive situations by which Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz have been pressured into fixed adaptation, yielding no optimistic outcomes. Throughout this a part of the 2024 Method 1 season, Ferrari misplaced its likelihood to win the Constructors’ Championship. Moreover, contemplating Charles Leclerc’s last hole of 81 factors to Max Verstappen, the concept the Monegasque may have competed for the Drivers’ Championship shouldn’t be far-fetched in any respect. There’s additionally one other difficulty weighing on the Constructors’ outcomes, the place the ultimate margin was a lot smaller, particularly may Ferrari have received the Constructors’ with out McLaren’s Mini DRS?
What we’re referring to is carefully inked to the disputes concerning McLaren’s legality. This brings us again to the dialogue concerning the rear wing. A kind of “mini drag discount system,” with which the MCL38 may preserve a downforce stage much like Ferrari’s however get pleasure from a transparent benefit in high-speed sections. Primarily, drag was lowered due to a selected aeroelasticity of the factor, which might barely open on straights even with the drag discount system closed. This benefit was estimated at a prime velocity acquire of at the least 3 or 4 kilometers per hour, which is clearly not insignificant in any respect.
Inside this situation, there are two interrelated points that increase considerations and never only for Ferrari. The primary includes the FIA’s perspective following Purple Bull’s report. To start out with, if the Milton Keynes crew had not filed a criticism, the MCL38 would have continued utilizing the disputed wing till the tip of the 2024 Method 1 championship. This highlights the inadequacy of the legislative physique, which makes the foundations however is completely incapable of implementing them. Furthermore, as soon as the questionable legality was established, the Worldwide Federation didn’t penalize McLaren.
As an alternative, it politely invited the Woking crew to retire the precise element. Moreover, by means of its technical director, former Ferrari engineer Nicholas Tombazis, it acknowledged that sure previous circumstances couldn’t be verified and subsequently instantly closed the matter. Sweeping the difficulty below the rug, basically. That is the FIA’s strategy. Creating such a precedent is very dangerous in Method 1. Why? As a result of a crew that goes unpunished units an instance for others, which, in flip, will really feel entitled to make use of borderline or outright unlawful options, realizing they’ll face no penalties.
Nevertheless, in our view, essentially the most severe matter considerations the second difficulty that surfaced with the modification to the technical laws for subsequent 12 months. The regulatory physique launched a change that appears tailored to stop an analogous or similar answer to that utilized by McLaren from being replicated. Beginning in 2025, the flap of the movable wing should adhere to the identical deformation restrictions as the remainder of the bodywork when the drag discount system is inactive. To be even clearer, the regulatory physique added a clause by way of Article 3.10.10.
There should be a compulsory minimal distance between the 2 components of the rear wing when the drag discount system shouldn’t be lively. Throughout the wingspan, the rear-end profiles should preserve a minimal distance between 9.4 and 13 millimeters. This parameter will probably be enforced when the system is inactive, with FIA inspections utilizing a calibrated spherical device to make sure full compliance earlier than official classes. At this level, a query arises and provides us a lot to consider concerning the matter.
Why does the FIA “ban” McLaren’s answer, thus deeming it unlawful, but through the championship selected to miss it and never penalize a crew that derived clear advantages? Is that this the usual process? Can we discuss a skewed championship? Simply within the Azerbaijan Grand Prix on the Baku metropolis circuit, the place the MCL38’s “Mini DRS” made the distinction, if we subtract 7 factors from Oscar Piastri (who completed first) and add them to Charles Leclerc, second on the end, the 2 groups would have tied with 659 factors. Furthermore, Ferrari would have had yet another victory. However sadly, retroactive penalties don’t exist.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
